Actually, at the end of this chapter, I was also thinking about it. When I wrote it yesterday, I thought it was inappropriate. The protagonist was good to two children who had suffered a lot, but what should I call them when they were stabbed? Is it too stupid to call them whether they are in love or not? I am also in contradiction with these two children. Hehe, they are not as shallow as some people say, but they are purely angry. Their hands are actually made this time.
Nalan
Remember that you describe the protagonist as a human being, not as an eagle-fed Buddha, which is even worse. Buddha’s compassion is for kindness, not hatred, which blinds the eyes. The shemale perverts human nature. They have said that they should never play anything influenced by the protagonist in reality. According to the development of the protagonist’s personality, he will eventually become a eunuch. Remember that the difference between good and evil in human nature can be good and evil in personal expression, but the protagonist can be good and harmful, but this does not guarantee that he can achieve the protagonist in front of the actual protagonist. If you think about it, you can write it. When you wake up in the end, you will bite because it is a child. The childhood experience of a person can be said to determine that his life can be changed without strong stimulation. Of course, the protagonist will be stabbed to death or seriously injured, and his hatred will be vented or may be changed, but remember that it is possible.
People change with the change of environment, even if they don’t want to change, but the means to realize their dreams will change, so that the protagonist’s wife or protagonist will be ravaged by two children. I don’t believe that the protagonist will not change. Hehe, this idea is a bit vicious. What will happen to the world without human association?
lih13
The protagonist doesn’t care if the two children let go of revenge. He didn’t treat the child as a bad person, and he didn’t talk about any influence. Say that he wants to influence Xiao Yi. What else is true? No one is willing to think about it from the perspective of children. Say that they suffered badly and experienced such pain. First, they are blindfolded by hatred. Is it because they are twins? First, they are not gay. Even if they are not, they can’t talk about transvestites. Emperor Wu also pampered Han Yan. Is he a transvestite? Besides, it’s not that they are willing to Do it on the premise of absolute safety. Do you want the protagonist to think differently? If you don’t understand the protagonist, it will be heinous. If you want to kill the protagonist, you should be trampled on 10,000 feet and let him never turn over. Of course, you will bite people. But the problem is that the protagonist hasn’t been seriously injured by the two children so far. He is a universal bodyguard. It’s okay to sympathize with each other and take care of each other.
Nalan
After reading it, I feel uncomfortable. The protagonist’s thinking is naive and unrealistic. Can’t you see that Xiao Li flies a knife and Li Xun gives his wife to others? Li Xun means that I am nobler than others and can give alms to others. They want to tie the knot because my wife hates his friends and hates himself. It is good to be a sadist and want to innovate, but it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the text is unrealistic and write the main points of the article. Don’t write the logic of human nature too distorted. There are many ways to compensate them than those two children. The protagonist has to be an emperor, and many hostile forces have changed. There are many ways to make friends and enemies, but the foundation is strength, otherwise others will look down on you. There is no substantive conflict. Strengthen communication between friends and enemies. The contradiction is irreconcilable. Either you kill him in front of him or you kill him. The protagonist does not take the initiative to give way away from the profit center. The bodyguard is fine in life, but it is always satisfactory if you can’t write this article. The situation is impossible. The 5,000-year history of mankind has already proved this.
beyndwy1
Because the protagonist is in such a state of mind, the contradiction is resolved, because in the eyes of the other party, the protagonist is really a cat-and-mouse game, which seems to be Lu Xun’s comment on Liu Bei’s words in the Three Kingdoms. Now, as the saying goes, it seems to be honest, but there are too many ways to be cunning than painful, and it is not necessary to kill the other party. I didn’t say that the child is a bad person, but it is not a good person in any way. Why don’t the protagonist really help them read a different identity or simply arrange him? Children live in seclusion, which can be regarded as several ways to atone for their former sins. It’s safe and simple, and there’s no need to make it so complicated. We have to get a influenced knot. The protagonist wants to control them and look at me. I should include the views of two children
lih13
Hehe, it’s a strange theory that it is not a good person to deliberately let others die. China people always admire the assassin in the Warring States Period. Jing Ke tried to kill the king of Qin. He is not a good person. Some people say that he is also a transvestite. To avenge Zhi Bo and kill Xiang Xiang, he pays tribute to him. He is a loyal man. Not only does he not pursue his murder, but he also gives him back Zhi Bo’s skull. What’s the difference between this protagonist and Su Liang Zhao Yi? But let Xiang take off his clothes and cut two swords for him after the final assassination. Killing this kind of person has always been regarded as a hero. When did I say that the protagonist wanted to be an emperor and wanted to fight for him? When the emperor was Zhou Ru, he set him up to give in. It’s easy to say, give up and let him go. Will people let him get out and leave? A man has no sin, but watch him fight for power, that is, power has committed a great crime in politics. How can the enemy rest assured if he doesn’t fight for him? How can he know that he is not delaying tactics and doesn’t want to get out before Xu Tu tries other strategies?
Nalan
The choice of the protagonist is thankless, but that is, no one can guarantee that when he chooses a person to do it, it is the wisest. Who knows that if he is determined, he may finally resolve all contradictions by fair means, but in fact, he has achieved his goal. If he is determined in his original intention, it is not the whole process that matters. Why do so many people look at these two little things? They are still young and plastic, and it is difficult to kill and save talents. This can actually be regarded as a manifestation of being determined in his own mind.
Is it too high?
I don’t want to deal with these two children’s problems as soon as possible or put them in chapter N. According to the current environment, it’s probably more difficult for the protagonist to realize his thoughts and worry about foreign invasion, but don’t tell me that he intends to be a good gentleman. Hehe, hello, I’m good, everyone feels like a child playing house and killing someone for personal gain. That’s not a hero but a gangster. Of course, the protagonist can’t be treated by gangsters before, but the second child obviously doesn’t have such ideological consciousness now, so what are you trying to say?
lih13
Also, when did I say that the protagonist is going to influence two children? The two children are not bad people, but he didn’t do anything bad except want to kill the protagonist. The protagonist left two children with him. He planned to think about it, but he was by no means superior. He wanted to influence who the protagonist thought about the two children. It was me, and I was willing to do it. Believe it or not, you don’t understand.
Nalan
It’s disrespectful for Nalan to talk nonsense and arbitrarily classify the two children as cynics, but there are still some humble opinions. Since it doesn’t affect the two children and make up for their previous mistakes, it’s too inappropriate to arrange the two children in this way. It’s hard to protect even the emperor in the court. It seems that these two people’s constant indulgence can’t make up for anything. It seems that the two children have not made much contribution to the plot. After all, if the court doesn’t send them to the palace to bury a foreshadowing, it needs to change. Too much, if you can handle it? Maybe I’m too demanding of those two children. I have a suggestion. Since the queen is tough and not cruel, let the queen negotiate to send the two children to the palace to a minister with a generous personality. That’s the case with the imperial leave of Dong. Miss Dong’s impression of cruelty will deepen after contacting the two children. It’s even more difficult to change her image, but isn’t it stronger to protect the two children?
Jianghejun
Who says they are heroes? Why do they want to be heroes? This is a life of resistance and a desperate struggle against cruel life. Who can say that this kind of behavior is evil?
Is it too high?
First of all, I never said that the second child is a hero. They are ordinary people who are very sad to be hurt and want revenge. This is the idea of ordinary people. Besides, don’t forget that at that time, the environment was full of eyes and ears from all sides. The protagonist suddenly sent two personal attendants to his near minister and sent them to the minister who was really loyal to the emperor. Will others see it as so simple? What are the lives of the two children in their eyes? They tied their hands and feet to force them to find out what the possibility is, so how much it is possible to implicate loyal ministers? At that time, the emperor was involved in that kind of environment,
Nalan
Attention, everyone, I don’t think Erxiao is a bad person, but it’s not a good person either. This is my point of view. In addition, although there is not much writing about Erxiao, I think its character image is much deeper than the protagonist. The flesh and blood is not a fake model opera character, nor is it a naive means. So much for realizing the role. Thank you.
lih13
Although the plot is always wonderful, I can’t watch it when I see chapter 39 here. Is it really a delicate girl who can’t kill the second child in this situation? The first few thoughts are that I can’t hide the second child and feel trouble. I am a shrewd man. I think that Emperor Zhou Juvenile is in a mess and indecisive and firm.
Feifanyu
Hey, I’m really pretty after reading it, but I’m puzzled by the fact that those two tried to kill the protagonist a few times, and the protagonist actually helped them. Let’s not talk about it. Even if he did so many assassinations, I think the Buddha was furious. I think it’s just that the protagonist is soft-hearted or sympathetic to them, but according to your writing, I really can’t imagine that people like the world really watched the fire.
Drifting wind
After reading chapter 39, I also feel that the plot is far-fetched. Anyway, the protagonist is an ordinary person and is not related to blood. In the face of repeated assassinations, he can still try his best to maintain the point of killing the heart. It is unreasonable because of the abuse of the second child. In fact, it is not the protagonist. Although the protagonist helps others to make up for his thoughts, it is also a measure, and it will not be limited.
Fengyin
If the assassination causes so many disputes, it’s really beyond my expectation. If the two assassinations prove that they are qualified killers by means of means, it’s really useless to teach them that if the assassination is to prove one thing, they want to know that if they don’t pretend to be in the life and death, the assassination will be hidden, and if they don’t report the success, they will be relieved. If they die, wouldn’t it be great if they really hate the tyrant? Even if they die, they may leave with a smile. Of course, it’s not. The sample depends on how to write Chapter 40. If the line is really stupid, but if it’s not over, it’s them. He’s himself, too. He’s called Sex Morality. They’re the closest to sex morality. If someone kills them, it means that if the efforts are all in vain during this period, it’s hard to make people believe him. If his heart is already tired and he accepts such a blow again, the little candle in his heart will go out.